Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150612
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '17 at 22:04
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 118 2-Core 224 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 724 69% 570 Pts	64-Core 918 57% 918 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 361.43 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 22.2 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 21.3 18% 20.7 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 18.2 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Areca RAID#1 8TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 270% 6.5TB free Firmware: R001 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	703% Outstanding	Read 4,700 Write 5,583 Mixed 1,079 840% 3,787 MB/s	4K Read 145 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 147 485% 146 MB/s	DQ Read 550 DQ Write 495 DQ Mixed 241 258% 429 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 703% Great: 338%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 155GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3837 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 135 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 62 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 36 (F1) Unknown 99 99 811238259	89.1% Excellent	Read 525 Write 493 Mixed 502 113% 506 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 21.7 113% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 20.3 40% 75.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3824 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 136 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 61 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 94 94 5852 (EB) Unknown 99 99 40 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2304371304	95.1% Outstanding	Read 525 Write 488 Mixed 491 112% 501 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 21.6 108% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 20.4 87% 192 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 124%
DIGINTEL HotSwap Bay1 4TB 3.5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.6% Good	Read 179 Write 167 Mixed 89.6 177% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.22 88% 1.15 MB/s

Corsair Flash Voyager GTX USB 3.0 128GB-$107 102 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 65GB free, PID 1a0e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 164 Mixed 195 237% 187 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 9.15 4K Mixed 4.5 534% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 5.35 636% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 229%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 5GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 107 Write 11 Mixed 17.6 39% 45 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.008 44% 3.84 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	111% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 43.7 MC Mixed 42.9 123% 42.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 23.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $211Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	40x
Core i7-6850KIntel $190Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	30x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $300Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $561

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353