Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '16 at 21:34
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 85.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 698
69% 565 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 22.2
19% 21.6 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 19
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Areca RAID#1 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: R001 Max speed: UDMA 25 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
663% Outstanding
Read 4,711
Write 5,503
Mixed 810
813% 3,675 MB/s
4K Read 161
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 89.3
443% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 86.2
87% 139 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 663%
Great: 338%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
201GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 498
Mixed 508
114% 510 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 37.3
132% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 20.3
104% 237 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 525
Write 471
Mixed 511
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 22.2
113% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 114
86% 111 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88%
Great: 124%
Digintel HotSwap Bay1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 163
Mixed 136
115% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.23
106% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 42.1
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 22.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $561
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback