Dell PowerEdge R720

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell PowerEdge R720
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R720  (all builds)
Memory250.6 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 24 '20 at 21:10
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 187
54% 103 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 664
60% 508 Pts
64-Core 2,532
157% 2,532 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-514 480GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 49 48 48 49 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.3% Poor
Read 233
Write 49.4
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 48.1
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.6
40% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 99%
Samsung HD080HJ/ 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: 0-51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 58.9
Write 11.9
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 11.2
18% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 33%
WD WD100PURZ-85W86Y0 10TB
919GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.1 6.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 678
Write 6.8
SusWrite 7.1
165% 230 MB/s
4K Read 254
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
10,671% 85 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 114%
HP MB014000JWUDB 14TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPD2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 86 106 116 103 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 110%
HP MB014000JWUDB 14TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPD2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 84 77 66 73 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 167
Write 161
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 72.4
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 2.5
425% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 110%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
74GB free
Firmware: 1E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 57.7
Write 11.5
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 11.1
18% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 33%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 24 25 28 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 105
Write 31.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 26.5
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 30 29 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 112
Write 31.8
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 29.2
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 25 30 27 29 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 108
Write 31.3
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 28.1
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 00AD063200AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 00CE063200CE M386B4G70DM0-CMA4 00CE063200CE M386B4G70DM0-CMA4 00AD063200AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 00AD063200AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 00CE063200CE M386B4G70DM0-CMA4 00CE063200CE M386B4G70DM0-CMA4 255GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 38.5
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R720 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback