Dell Inspiron 7559

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Inspiron 7559  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0H87XC
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 07:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 174
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 342
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 347 249 141 149 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 429
Write 363
Mixed 330
SusWrite 225
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 35.2
123% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 270
196% 253 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80%
Great: 95%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
411GB free
Firmware: HEF01D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 81 79 78 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 194
Write 66.8
Mixed 80
SusWrite 80.6
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 15
2,856% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 19.9
DQ Mixed 18.1
192% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 04CD000004CD F3-1600C11-8GSQ 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 7559 Builds (Compare 2,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 7559

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback