Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '20 at 09:29
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 228 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 724 71% 583 Pts	64-Core 1,253 78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Lighting 45.3 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 39.2 37% 39 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 42.8 Splatting 37.6 32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 511GB 791 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 503 444 461 472 464 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 2,846 Write 2,098 Mixed 1,362 SusWrite 495 377% 1,700 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 47.3 155% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 552 DQ Write 720 DQ Mixed 492 411% 588 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 271%
Amd-raid XPG SPECTRIX S40 256GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 134GB free Firmware: VB41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 115 130 117 114 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 953 Write 1,043 Mixed 866 SusWrite 161 169% 756 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 42.5 139% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 581 DQ Mixed 323 267% 369 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 180%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 186GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.1 4.7 4.7 7.4 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	7.37% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 3.5 Mixed 5 SusWrite 5.8 6% 8.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.37% Great: 72%
Amd-raid HDS722020ALA330 2TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 16GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 54 51 52 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 73.1 Write 57.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 50.6 37% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 50%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 40GB free Firmware: MK7O SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 119 123 129 128 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	71% Very good	Read 126 Write 109 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 121 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 77%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 29GB free Firmware: MK7O SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 87 89 92 92 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 80 Write 79.6 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 88.1 53% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 77%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 137GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 20 20 17 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 83.1 Write 45.5 Mixed 37.9 SusWrite 18.2 34% 46.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 27.7 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 26.7 79% 27.5 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16