Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 26.8 2-Core 54.5 35% 50 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 108 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 18 Parallax 27.1 16% 21.6 fps	MRender 15 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 20.9 16% 18.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk U100 32GB 373 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.56.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 16 14 15 17 23 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.6% Very poor	Read 107 Write 39.6 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 17.7 12% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 3.2 18% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 41%
Hitachi HTS541080G9SA00 80GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 66GB free Firmware: MB4OC60R SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 29 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 23.6 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 29.3 18% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 16%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 232GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 109 109 112 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 102 Write 106 Mixed 47.9 SusWrite 109 66% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.8 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 6400IntelBench 35%, 5,556 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x
Pentium E5200Intel $47Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	1x
G965 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 13 samples	1x