| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7A36 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36) (all builds) |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190121 |
| Uptime | 3.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 01 '20 at 16:45 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.7%
Good
|
69% 124 Pts
|
56% 463 Pts
|
49% 796 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87
|
49.4%
Average
|
50% 57.3 fps
|
49% 59.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 345 343 352 353 354 MB/s
|
94.4%
Outstanding
|
83% 370 MB/s
|
126% 46 MB/s
|
214% 315 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
644GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 174 176 178 176 174 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
98% 136 MB/s
|
139% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.C16FF CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.1%
Below average
|
35% 12.4 GB/s
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
40% 98.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 590 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 125x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 62x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 61x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 110x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 50x |
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 34x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $191 |