Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 944
85% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,276
79% 1,276 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 63.3
55% 66.4 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 62.8
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
105GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 358 352 346 340 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 481
Mixed 442
SusWrite 359
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 58
191% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 99 101 99 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 154
Write 131
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 98.1
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 107%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.1 6 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 5.8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 6
10% 9.27 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.C16FF CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 27.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 10R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 30% 33 344 283 240 24.5" 1920 1080 DELA103 DELL AW2518HF
History: Score 40: 8R 0G 0B | Score 50: 10R 0G 0B
Typical GA-B450M GAMING Builds (Compare 1,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback