PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7A12 |
Motherboard | MSI Z170A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A12) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151214 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | May 09 '20 at 03:15 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
77%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1668 MHz, MLim: 1927 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 141 125 115 110 107 MB/s
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
917GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 150 153 152 150 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR4 2800 2OZ 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.5%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 1,434x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 628x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 164x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 530x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 327x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 309x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $573 |