Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 15 '20 at 11:25
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 52.5 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 97.8 50% 81 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 254 30% 229 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.3% Above average	Lighting 63 Reflection 62.2 Parallax 62.4 51% 62.6 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 60.2 Splatting 61.1 51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 2.4 10 71 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 392 Write 323 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 92.6 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 1 23% 7.37 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 4.6 DQ Mixed 0.6 18% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 125GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 161 154 161 166 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 137 Mixed 31 SusWrite 160 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GRR 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2133, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43.8% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 14.8 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	723x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	479x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	305x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	453x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	394x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	253x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	128x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16