Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory46.8 GB free of 56 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 14:31
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
None, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 164
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 498
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M60
Nvidia(10DE 115E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1177 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.06
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 52
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 59.8
42% 60 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 61
51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 365GB
332GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 339 319 343 362 349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 606
Write 591
Mixed 541
SusWrite 338
117% 519 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 23.1
74% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 298
222% 292 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%
Virtual HD 136GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 31 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 14.5
Write 8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 22.7
12% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 67%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 275GB
256GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 39 40 41 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 84
Write 42.3
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 40.2
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.7
293% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 56GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 23553 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 46.8
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback