Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 65 User benchmarks, average bench 47% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 149 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 144 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Virtual HD 500GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 65 61 59 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 177 Write 73.1 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 60.7 73% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 68%
Seagate iSCSI Storage 220GB 4GB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 20 26 25 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 62 Write 24 SusWrite 24.2 26% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0 630% 6.13 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 64 slots used 2GB Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 22.2 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 8.5 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,043x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16