Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 23:31
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 142
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 418
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$155
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 35.8
23% 32.3 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 37.6
26% 30.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 68 62 69 63 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.1% Average
Read 180
Write 122
Mixed 145
SusWrite 70.4
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 27.6
93% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 88.1
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 96.6
75% 102 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
537GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 156 159 158 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 168
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 157
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
7GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.4 5.1 8 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 6.5
11% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback