Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu LifeBook T5010 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB1EA
Memory	0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090216
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 12:08
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9550-$199 1,427 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 48.5 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 70.1 32% 51 Pts	4-Core 74.4 8-Core 70.8 10% 72.6 Pts	64-Core 69.3 4% 69.3 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fujitsu(10CF 1458) 769MB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.49 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS064GE4BBDC 64GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z1000001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 8.9 1 17 16 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 66.2 Write 17 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 12.7 21% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.3 571% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.76% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 1.1 MC Mixed 1.3 4% 1.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 0.7 SC Mixed 0.9 3% 0.9 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5.76% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16