Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	18.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	4.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 28 '20 at 16:20
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Common KVM processor 2,228 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	23.1% Poor	Memory 28.7 1-Core 50.6 2-Core 101 32% 60 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 105 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 98.9 6% 98.9 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 98%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 136GB 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 78 75 71 84 65 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.3% Very poor	Read 218 Write 162 Mixed 225 SusWrite 72.5 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 5.3 16% 5.43 MB/s

Red Hat VirtIO 17GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 15GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 94 86 94 93 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	94.1% Outstanding	Read 236 Write 202 Mixed 225 SusWrite 89.5 141% 188 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 5.1 837% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 94%
Red Hat VirtIO 91GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 51GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 80 76 84 92 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	90.8% Outstanding	Read 233 Write 220 Mixed 235 SusWrite 81.4 144% 192 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 5.8 948% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x1GB 247 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 1 slots used 1GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 10.8 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 8 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 263 15% 263 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16