Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 22:09
Run Duration388 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 158
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 476
45% 375 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1581 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$229
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 248 236 254 257 198 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 490
Write 449
Mixed 398
SusWrite 224
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 43
143% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 235
170% 223 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 122%
WDC WD80EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
621GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 67 65 80 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 156
Write 125
Mixed 57
SusWrite 71.2
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.4
7% 3.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 3.8
DQ Mixed 3
2% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 23%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 173 172 173 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 113
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 172
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 122%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
881GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 221 222 219 234 229 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 216
Mixed 103
SusWrite 225
136% 186 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.1
318% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$246
2TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 116
Write 124
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 89.5
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
345% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 110%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
5.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 96 98 90 88 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 213
Write 211
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 93.7
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.7
232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 122%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 156 156 156 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 155
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 158
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.1
298% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 115%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 151 154 155 166 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 115%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 177 177 179 178 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 169
Mixed 90
SusWrite 175
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.1
293% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 136%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$110
4TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 156 158 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 155
Mixed 103
SusWrite 156
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 99%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
5.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 93 90 89 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 185
Write 192
Mixed 82
SusWrite 91.5
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
220% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 122%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 129 129 130 128 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 134
Write 132
Mixed 70
SusWrite 129
155% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
WDC WD60 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 17 17 17 17 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
Read 150
Write 164
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 18.1
122% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 55%
WDC WD60 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 117 118 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
Read 142
Write 153
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 118
156% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 55%
WDC WD40 03FFBX-68MU3N0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 117 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 193
Write 208
Mixed 81
SusWrite 118
196% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 1.5
348% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 5.3
DQ Mixed 1.9
249% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback