MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7641
Motherboard	MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641) (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '17 at 17:29
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 68.3 2-Core 129 58% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 207 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PwrHis(1787 2335) 2GB CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 4.87 Reflection 5.85 Parallax 6.66 4% 5.79 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 4.74 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 515 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 208 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 62 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2326304299	44% Average	Read 208 Write 165 Mixed 160 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 17.4 79% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 53.9 DQ Mixed 18.8 21% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 124%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 182GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 216 182 4191 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3268 (05) Reallocated sector count 197 197 20 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 20 20 58815 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1045 (BE) vendor-specific 68 50 32 (C2) HDA temperature 118 100 32 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32% Below average	Read 55.1 Write 56 Mixed 40.6 38% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.47 119% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 35%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 26GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 67 (03) Spinup time 148 148 12895912077 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 532 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 108 108 37 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2024 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 375 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 533 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 533 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 150324772891 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	54% Above average	Read 90.2 Write 97.8 Mixed 48.6 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.2 81% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 107%
UFD USB Flash Drive 8GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID a740 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	5.66% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 8.34 Mixed 11.3 15% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.46 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 18% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.66% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM 1866 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.3% Average	MC Read 21 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 17.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 13.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	106x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	39x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	33x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	16x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16