Fujitsu D3041-A1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu D3041-A1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3041-A1
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 18:10
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6800
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 89.8
44% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 93
8-Core 93.8
12% 93.4 Pts
64-Core 94.5
6% 94.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Asus(1043 82C7) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.43
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 56 63 85 83 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 83.1
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 69.1
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
433GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 162 162 157 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 153
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 160
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 103%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
279GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 17 12 18 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 23
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 17.9
28% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D3041-A1 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu D3041-A1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback