Asus MAXIMUS VII IMPACT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII IMPACT  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 12 '16 at 06:11
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 394
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 59.5
51% 63.4 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 55
50% 62 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 175
Write 71.9
Mixed 89.5
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 8.8
83% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 90.8
DQ Mixed 30.1
30% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
82GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 173
Write 102
Mixed 121
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.19
103% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
588GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 37
Mixed 14.5
36% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.21
55% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R934G2134U1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 21.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII IMPACT Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII IMPACT - $235

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $883
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback