PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190524 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jun 09 '20 at 22:06 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Palit(1569 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 34 18 2.5 1.9 2.8 MB/s
|
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
159GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 55 60 38 46 55 MB/s
|
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB
18GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
R748G2133U2S-U 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
32%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,865x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 863x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 188x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 459x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 392x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 356x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $285 |