Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 22:58
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 141
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 577
51% 434 Pts
64-Core 917
57% 917 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
Dell(1028 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 17
18% 17.6 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 19.5
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB160G4 160GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0355
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 181 185 185 187 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 236
Write 189
Mixed 168
SusWrite 185
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 24.6
101% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 179
135% 182 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 33.8
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRA/X9SRA-3 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $691
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback