Intel X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel X58  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 14:23
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 156
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 343
42% 324 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 29.5
27% 31.7 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 31
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 250 251 253 251 253 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
583 240GB
182GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.9 9.9 10 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.38% Terrible
Read 28.9
Write 24.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 10
5% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 6.2
21% 6.67 MB/s
Seagate Expansion 1TB
3GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.9 9.9 9.9 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 24.4
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 10
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 66%
Seagate BUP Slim GD 2TB
207GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 22.6
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 9.9
14% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
237GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 93 95 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 91.9
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 92.7
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF8 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1066, 33 MHz
16384, 36864 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 3.9
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback