Today's hottest deals

Intel X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel X58  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 21:29
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 131
62% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 375
37% 303 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Nvidia(10DE 105F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 16.7
17% 17.5 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 16.7
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 664 258 257 257 257 257 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
17GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 2.9 7.5 7.8 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 29.8
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 10.6
15% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 63%
Seagate BUP Slim GD 2TB
39GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 22.1
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 19.5
16% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
165GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 93 95 90 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 95.5
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 93.8
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 62%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
101GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 22 19 19 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 28.8
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 17.7
19% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF8 Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 Winbond W25X/Q32 68GB
1066, 1066, 33 MHz
16384, 16384, 36864 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback