ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 00AL034

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	IBM 00AL034 (all builds)
Memory	51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190613
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '20 at 00:30
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Socket 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 86.1 2-Core 169 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 574 54% 451 Pts	64-Core 1,554 96% 1,554 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 1982) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Lighting 80 Reflection 86.3 Parallax 81.9 65% 82.8 fps	MRender 80 Gravity 74.8 Splatting 69.1 60% 74.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 256GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 397 388 387 380 395 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 351 Write 346 Mixed 342 SusWrite 391 81% 358 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 8.8 29% 8.7 MB/s	DQ Read 64.2 DQ Write 56.2 DQ Mixed 59.9 45% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 126%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB 11,576 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 437GB free Firmware: 0Q00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 427 419 422 422 421 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 352 Write 349 Mixed 346 SusWrite 425 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 8.4 28% 9.2 MB/s	DQ Read 64.9 DQ Write 57 DQ Mixed 60.5 46% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 115%
IBM ServeRAID M5110 8TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 6.5TB free Firmware: 3.46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 189 208 228 206 212 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.7% Excellent	Read 95 Write 147 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 197 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.3 112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 16x4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 16 of 24 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 29.9 93% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback