IBM 00AL034

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIBM 00AL034  (all builds)
Memory53 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 05:11
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 159
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 617
55% 467 Pts
64-Core 1,581
98% 1,581 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Nvidia(10DE 13A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 165
Parallax 189
109% 163 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 158
Splatting 110
123% 157 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 111%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 381 406 403 386 374 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 481
Write 373
Mixed 404
SusWrite 384
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 31.2
104% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 254
192% 258 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 126%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
295GB free
Firmware: 0Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 381 433 425 426 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 485
Write 440
Mixed 412
SusWrite 407
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 28.5
94% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 255
192% 258 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 115%
IBM ServeRAID M5110 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 215 209 224 222 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.2% Excellent
Read 89.5
Write 100
Mixed 66
SusWrite 218
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
109% 1 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170EH1-CH9 16x4GB
16 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 29.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.8
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback