ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProBook 430 G3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP ProBook 430 G3 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 80FF
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160808
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '17 at 09:27
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 69.3 42% 59.5 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 261 26% 215 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 80FF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	2.68% Terrible	Lighting 2.57 Reflection 4.62 Parallax 3 2% 3.39 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 2.73 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.68% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB 20,023 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 839GB free (System drive) Firmware: SE0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 123 100 64424509441 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 126 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 489 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 126 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 337903652 (BF) G-sense error rate 98 98 578 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 655370 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1457 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	52.3% Above average	Read 82.6 Write 99.6 Mixed 79.3 65% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.15 58% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 60%
Msft Virtual Disk 1GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.9% Above average	Read 105 Write 97.1 Mixed 91.3 73% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.17 72% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	40% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.3 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical ProBook 430 G3 Builds (Compare 469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 430 G3

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	296x
Core i3-6100UIntelBench 43%, 24,116 samples	96x
Core i7-6500UIntelBench 46%, 102,213 samples	48x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	454x
HD Graphics 510IntelBench 2%, 6,504 samples	15x

SSD
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	22x
SD7SN6S-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 73%, 1,206 samples	21x
SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,074 samples	15x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	21x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	19x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback