| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190514 |
| Uptime | 2.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 20 '20 at 14:23 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | HKG-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.4%
Good
|
74% 119 Pts
|
36% 267 Pts
|
14% 232 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
|
57.7%
Above average
|
58% 72 fps
|
57% 69.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 16 20 106 40 19 MB/s
|
25.1%
Poor
|
27% 122 MB/s
|
49% 13.5 MB/s
|
7% 12.6 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
276GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 164 166 167 170 172 MB/s
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
102% 139 MB/s
|
176% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Verbatim OTG Tiny 16GB
0GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
57% 55.9 MB/s
|
60% 2.1 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905702-136.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
35.3%
Below average
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
25% 8.9 GB/s
|
60% 66.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,811 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,302x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,143x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 136x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 565x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 310x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 267x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $279 |