Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 11:43
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 130
59% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 213
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 20.1
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 23
Splatting 17
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 124 129 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 141
Write 80.6
Mixed 99
SusWrite 90.8
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 13.9
77% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 15.9
20% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
844GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 124 124 126 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 124
Write 115
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 123
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: PT05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 150 149 150 149 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 150
Write 136
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 147
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback