Huananzhi X99-TF

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

18 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Huananzhi X99-TF (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200826
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '22 at 14:50
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 6,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 162 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 736 65% 554 Pts	64-Core 1,415 88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 189 Parallax 184 142% 182 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 180 Splatting 123 118% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB 994 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111H0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 93 144 205 289 299 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 1,386 Write 172 Mixed 86.8 SusWrite 196 98% 460 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 14.8 90% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 104 126% 225 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%
Thnsf5512gpuk TOSHIBA 512GB 1,826 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 476GB free Firmware: 51045KLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 401 397 429 389 397 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 934 Write 881 Mixed 776 SusWrite 410 168% 750 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 42.9 139% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 760 DQ Write 578 DQ Mixed 650 491% 663 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 163%
Crucial MTFDDAK512TBN-1AR1ZABHA 512GB 1,111 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 429GB free Firmware: HPC0012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 214 217 198 224 220 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 423 Write 448 Mixed 379 SusWrite 210 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 34.6 118% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 328 247% 330 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 98%
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GB 1,497 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 476GB free Firmware: M603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 210 211 196 218 214 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 414 Write 395 Mixed 319 SusWrite 206 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 37.5 126% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 247 212% 313 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 110%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 100 100 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 99.1 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 99.9 63% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 596GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 113 115 112 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 120 Write 112 Mixed 79.1 SusWrite 112 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 65%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 584GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 112 117 113 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 107 Write 131 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 115 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 91 89 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 95.1 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 89.2 66% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB 405 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 27.1 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 18.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-TF Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Huananzhi X99-TF

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	200x
Xeon E5-2673 v3IntelBench 70%, 592 samples	17x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	20x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	19x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	15x

SSD
SA2000M8250G 250GBKingstonBench 171%, 42,173 samples	9x
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	6x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	6x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	11x
Atermiter 4x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 483 samples	8x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16