Asus G752VS

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G752VS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G752VS
Memory	56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190424
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '20 at 13:47
Run Duration	331 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HK 20,362 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 89.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 232 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 608 67% 530 Pts	64-Core 608 38% 608 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Asus(1043 13F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Lighting 99.6 Reflection 118 Parallax 90.7 81% 103 fps	MRender 95.8 Gravity 93.2 Splatting 102 80% 97 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SKC2000 1TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 272% 518GB free Firmware: S268 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 975 924 1330 1282 1294 1139 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,554 Write 1,716 Mixed 110 SusWrite 1,157 254% 1,134 MB/s	4K Read 55.1 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 70.1 254% 92.3 MB/s	DQ Read 566 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 241 208% 320 MB/s
Poor: 187% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 357%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 14,022 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57XA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 885 653 941 707 1175 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 950 Write 554 Mixed 958 SusWrite 807 184% 817 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 63.6 223% 82.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,009 DQ Write 746 DQ Mixed 701 572% 819 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 235%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 748GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 448 443 425 434 439 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 461 Mixed 372 SusWrite 439 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 41.1 145% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 182 140% 193 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 122%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 253GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 124 124 125 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 56.5 Write 63.2 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 124 47% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 907GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 33.7 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 14.5 22% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 66%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 12 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.3% Terrible	Read 5.5 Write 4.7 Mixed 11 SusWrite 12 12% 8.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 5.3% Great: 20%
Innostor Ext. HDD 2TB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 179GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 9 Write 24.5 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 15.4 21% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.4 111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 3,195 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 228GB free, PID 2312 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 29.3 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 14.1 35% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 43%
Toshiba StorE HDD 2TB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 227GB free, PID 0b16 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 16 16 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 32.5 Write 33 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 15 32% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.4 186% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 26%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 3,195 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 101GB free, PID 2312 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 27.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 14 34% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC Kingston 9905703-002.A00G M471A2K43BB1-CRC Kingston 9905630-031.A00G 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 26.3 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 26.8 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G752VS Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

System: Asus G752VS

CPU
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	225x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	214x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	439x

SSD
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	92x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	78x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $31Bench 183%, 9,202 samples	39x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 18,452 samples	146x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GBSamsungBench 76%, 4,237 samples	122x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 4x16GBSamsungBench 79%, 500 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16