Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 54.2 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 124 46% 80 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 446 42% 350 Pts	64-Core 1,278 79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 6338) 2GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.2 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 20.6 16% 18.4 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 20.6 16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MR9265-8i 800GB 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 383 382 388 397 397 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

LSI MR9265-8i 2.5TB 192GB free Firmware: 3.44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 861 979 978 913 1013 884 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$372 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2.5TB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 452 438 432 434 438 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 450 Mixed 442 SusWrite 438 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 23 113% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 240 184% 247 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 133%
H/W RAID10 6TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 759GB free Firmware: 0960 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 96 95 100 86 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 140 Write 80.2 Mixed 54.9 SusWrite 91.4 67% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-071.A 9965516-071.A 9965516-071.A 9965516-071.A 9965516-071.A 9965516-071.A 9965516-071.A 9965516-071.A Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C Hynix HM... 256GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.3% Excellent	MC Read 40.4 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 33.3 104% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16