Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$40 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 77.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 201 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 326 45% 334 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Sapphire(174B 2015) CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	8.68% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 31.6 Parallax 34.2 0% 21.9 fps	MRender 28.9 Gravity 24 Splatting 37.7 26% 30.2 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 8.68% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 64GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 36GB free (System drive) SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2 0 0.3 2.5 2.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.24% Terrible	Read 5 Write 10.5 Mixed 11 SusWrite 1.7 5% 7.05 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.24% Great: 34%
CGM Virtual Disk 38422 306GB 113GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.4 5.3 5 4.3 4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.48% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 8.5 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 4.5 6% 7.75 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 201% 1.53 MB/s

CGM Virtual Disk 39446 9TB 1.5TB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.5 5.5 5.4 4.2 4.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25 47,473 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 12.6 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	857x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	481x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	372x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	113x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	81x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	67x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157