Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 12:14
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 125
70% 109 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 266
39% 284 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 40726 1TB
123GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 50 43 25 38 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
Read 54.8
Write 9.9
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 33.1
7% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 10.9
32% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 0.7
DQ Mixed 0.4
2% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 14%
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 64GB
21GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 17 24 34 24 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 89.3
Write 50.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 27.8
42% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 6.3
1,016% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2V-CF Builds (Compare 487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback