Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results


Gaming 137% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 126% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X (all builds)
Memory	58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180829
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '20 at 21:33
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 95.9 1-Core 148 2-Core 299 100% 181 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 952 95% 774 Pts	64-Core 1,174 73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 1E04) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	134% Outstanding	Lighting 171 Reflection 184 Parallax 176 139% 177 fps	MRender 245 Gravity 192 Splatting 127 147% 188 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 199 185 175 165 157 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 476 Mixed 325 SusWrite 211 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 52.9 171% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 354 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 8GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 490 Write 466 Mixed 460 106% 472 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 57.6 190% 67.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 357 269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 12GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 482 Write 477 Mixed 391 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 54.8 187% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 85GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 75 80 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 52.7 Write 74.2 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 78.8 51% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.5 201% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 76GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 85 85 90 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 51.2 Write 94.3 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 91.9 58% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.8 255% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 49 49 32 45 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 28.8 Write 28.3 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 44.9 24% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1.5TB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1TB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 33 35 33 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 21.7 Write 24.5 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 32.9 34% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.5% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 25.2 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 36 SC Mixed 28.3 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 54.2 74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 11,907 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,979x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	2,745x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,639x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	936x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	875x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	772x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	455x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	445x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	346x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	482x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	400x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	337x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $788

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16