Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3P-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3P-B3  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '17 at 11:32
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 144
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
EVGA(3842 2956) 2GB
CLim: 1527 MHz, MLim: 1673 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 36.4
Parallax 35.8
32% 37.2 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 34.7
29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 507
Write 404
Mixed 410
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 21.1
120% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 20.9
63% 136 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
126GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 88.2
Mixed 95.3
70% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.27
78% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
46GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 67.1
Mixed 63.3
50% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 67%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
28GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 70.8
Write 73.4
Mixed 72.2
54% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.25
96% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 88%
Samsung STORY Station 3TB
214GB free, PID 5f06
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 25.9
Mixed 28.6
36% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.21
70% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 029E CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68X-UD3P-B3 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3P-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $677
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback