Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350D APU 269 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	22% Poor	Memory 37.7 1-Core 19.7 2-Core 35.9 21% 31.1 Pts	4-Core 38.6 8-Core 39.2 5% 38.9 Pts	64-Core 36 2% 36 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 9802) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.26 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.19 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB 14,337 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: UK500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 4.5 67 4.2 4 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 381 Write 300 Mixed 256 SusWrite 47 55% 246 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 12.7 40% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 92.4 DQ Write 71.8 DQ Mixed 45.4 44% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-DI M2F4G64CB8HG4N-DI 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 5.3 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.8 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-350D APUAMDBench 27%, 269 samples	3x
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	3x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6310 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 53 samples	1x

SSD
S600 120GBHPBench 54%, 1,850 samples	1x
1 28GBWalramBench 54%, 2 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
9905403-037.A00G 2x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 20 samples	1x
DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 8GBAdataBench 38%, 23 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16