Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime8.6 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 21:36
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 806
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 1355
84% 1355 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6694) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 176
Parallax 185
137% 176 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 168
Splatting 115
107% 133 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,212
Write 2,021
Mixed 1,462
422% 1,898 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 82.4
267% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,071
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 1,011
760% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
39GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 271 293 286 221 210 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 415
Write 268
Mixed 172
SusWrite 250
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 23.9
96% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 64.3
90% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
96GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 449 434 420 393 323 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 439
Mixed 392
SusWrite 409
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 44.5
140% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 154
132% 204 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 134%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 960GB-$300
25GB free
Firmware: X212T0RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 132 127 112 132 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 473
Write 345
Mixed 196
SusWrite 151
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 28.7
106% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 71.4
DQ Mixed 153
129% 196 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 114%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 159 158 159 160 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 171
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 157
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 28.7
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 10.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $791
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback