PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ |
Memory | 44.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150304 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 10 '17 at 14:02 |
Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
|
74.6%
Very good
|
70% 119 Pts
|
54% 443 Pts
|
80% 1,293 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.78
|
85.7%
Excellent
|
88% 102 fps
|
82% 99.1 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() IBM ServeRAID M1215 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.22
|
163%
Outstanding
|
248% 1,131 MB/s
|
103% 37.7 MB/s
|
142% 314 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
86.9%
Excellent
|
99% 444 MB/s
|
101% 36 MB/s
|
87% 154 MB/s
|
![]() Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
|
208%
Outstanding
|
219% 298 MB/s
|
132% 0.79 MB/s
|
|
![]() Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
|
129%
Outstanding
|
156% 209 MB/s
|
197% 2 MB/s
|
|
![]() |
116%
Outstanding
|
130% 175 MB/s
|
81% 0.75 MB/s
|
|
![]() Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
955GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M392B5673FH0-CH9 24x2GB
24 of 24 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
97% 33.8 GB/s
|
26% 9.13 GB/s
|
57% 70.7 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 7x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 5x |
CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples | 5x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 7x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,135Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 4x |
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples | 3x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 7x |
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples | 3x |
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $198Bench 290%, 10,709 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $323 |