TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120215
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 16 '20 at 04:58
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 82
2-Core 145
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 208
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 63.4%
 Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Sapphire(174B E109) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 2.94
4% 4.52 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 5
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.43%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
914GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 41 30 23 16 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 26.3
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 37.6%
 Great: 68%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 77.2
Write 52.6
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 76
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 44.1%
 Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 28.7%
 Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H61M-S2PV Builds (Compare 1,535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV - $99

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples210x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples176x
Core i3-2120Intel  $75Bench 51%, 77,810 samples108x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples162x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples133x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples87x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples56x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples33x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung  $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples24x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples27x
99U5471-020.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 3,387 samples19x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples19x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback