HP 500-c60

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-c60  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B05
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 06:53
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 48
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 60
30% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 91.7
8-Core 110
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
HP(103C 2B05) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 2.69
1% 2.7 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.43
2% 2.06 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 640GB
126GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.4 6.5 6.6 6 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6.4
6% 8.43 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 58 75 66 79 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 80.8
Write 66
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 74.6
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.6
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-c60 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-c60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback