PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160122 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 23 '20 at 09:59 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 29 33 35 30 30 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
|||
Toshib DT01ACA100 1TB
295GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 77 103 100 103 88 MB/s
|
5.8%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 131x |
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 118x |
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 89x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 73x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 70x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $314 |