Acer Aspire E5-475G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-475G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer AntMan_SK
Memory4.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 23 '20 at 19:25
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 59%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 121
53% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 155
17% 136 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 110F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.23
Reflection 10
Parallax 3.16
3% 5.46 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 2.77
Splatting 0.04
2% 2.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T871202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 84 97 83 89 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 386
Write 356
Mixed 161
SusWrite 97.6
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 15.7
70% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 75.5
89% 157 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
141GB free
Firmware: 1001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 60 59 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 64
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 60.9
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA500 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 42 42 47 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 159
Write 143
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 46.3
125% 101 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
157% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 71%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-22ZCT0 320GB
130GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 42 42 47 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 48
Write 47.5
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 46.7
60% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 25%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA600 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 9.1 13 9 10 9.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 147
Write 150
Mixed 70
SusWrite 9.2
116% 94 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
117% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 80%
WDC WD80 PURZ-85YNPY0 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 10 15 10 12 7.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
Read 150
Write 178
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 10.2
133% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-033.A00G 04CB AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-475G Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-475G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback