Acer Aspire E5-476G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-476G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL AntMan_SK
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 23:01
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 106
2-Core 179
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 149
32% 216 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1219) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 6.5
5% 8.07 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ACM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 59 49 81 105 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 90.8
Write 88.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 75
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-033.A00G 04CB AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.9% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 15
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 14.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-476G Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-476G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback