Today's hottest deals

Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 06:08
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 194
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 273
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 50.9
45% 53.7 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 49
Splatting 50.2
45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$77
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 138 139 136 128 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 400
Write 203
Mixed 192
SusWrite 142
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 29.8
120% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 40.7
43% 68.3 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 129%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
370GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 38.5
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 1.3
34% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 47%
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB
302GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 36 36 34 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 39
Write 36.7
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 34
46% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 37%
WDC WD30 PURX-64P6ZY0 3TB
41GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.8 5.1 4.7 4.5 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.2% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 36.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 4.7
36% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 39%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
177GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 38.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 0.4
35% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU88C-26N1900 0898 KD48GU88C-26N190A 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 23.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback