PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190514 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 25 '20 at 06:08 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
68.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
|
45%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$77
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 138 139 136 128 126 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
370GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 7 MB/s
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB
302GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 36 36 34 36 MB/s
|
19%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD30 PURX-64P6ZY0 3TB
41GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.8 5.1 4.7 4.5 4.7 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
177GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.1%
Very good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $83Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 365x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $110Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 162x |
Core i5-9400Intel $127Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 76x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $150Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 95x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $218Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 84x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 79x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $258 |