Samsung R59P/R60P/R61P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung R59P/R60P/R61P  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R59P/R60P/R61P
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 15:55
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T2410
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 33.5
28% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 37.5
8-Core 39.5
5% 38.5 Pts
64-Core 44.3
3% 44.3 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Sanyo(144D C034) 512MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.78 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHY2160BH 160GB-$48
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000000B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 9.1 15 16 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 22.1
Write 19
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 13.2
14% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 27%
USB DISK 2.0 2GB
1GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.9 2.7 2.7 3 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 4.2
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 2.7
7% 6.1 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
9.55% Terrible
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R59P/R60P/R61P Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R59P/R60P/R61P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback