Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560x1080x4294967296 szín,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130803
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '17 at 10:31
Run Duration	315 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 102 2-Core 213 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 409 53% 398 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Sapphire(174B E241) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Lighting 37 Reflection 33.5 Parallax 45.3 30% 38.6 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 31.2 Splatting 38.2 28% 33 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1900 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 517 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 44 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4265111617	78.8% Very good	Read 501 Write 400 Mixed 407 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 20.2 74% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 108 123% 213 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 124%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 58GB free Firmware: 00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2253 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 584 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 549 (AD) Unknown 100 100 131078 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C2) HDA temperature 63 48 223339479077 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 688 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 662 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2054 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2 (F5) Unknown 100 100 6 (F6) Unknown 100 100 178752	79.6% Very good	Read 510 Write 462 Mixed 457 106% 476 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 13.8 60% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 14.3 86% 200 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 111%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 53GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 187 6383 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4965 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 8822 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2277 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 62 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 149 149 154154 (C2) HDA temperature 111 91 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46% Average	Read 91.3 Write 69 Mixed 73.1 58% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.16 60% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 59%
USB DISK 2.0 2GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.85% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 5.7 Mixed 8.37 13% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.69 4K Write 0.08 4K Mixed 0.05 33% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.85% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 16,567 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60.9% Good	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.5 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87-HD3 Builds (Compare 1,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	466x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	357x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	295x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	170x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	159x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	104x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	69x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	48x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	52x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	43x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359