Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro15,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro15,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-827FB448E656EC26
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 05:34
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8279U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 232
74% 138 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 557
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$94
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 87.5
58% 75.8 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 55.9
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Generic External 240GB
123GB free (System drive), PID 3920
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 27 34 35 34 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 32.3
Write 34.2
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 29.8
44% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 8.5
539% 7.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 19.9
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 17.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro15,2 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro15,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback