Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515DA
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 20:02
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 208
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 510
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1FBF) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.44.10
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.8% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 11
Parallax 16.5
9% 12.9 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.3
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P32A8-256GC1 256GB
164GB free
Firmware: VC0S0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1420 1443 1429 131 80 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1387
Write 1,486
Mixed 1,176
SusWrite 764
270% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 52.8
194% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 655
DQ Mixed 583
425% 543 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 185%
Great: 213%
Generic External 240GB
96GB free (System drive), PID 3920
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 112 136 34 66 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 226
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 108
184% 146 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 21.3
1,908% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 26
2,433% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 160%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WHS84S8AZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.7
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_X515DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback