Timi TM1613

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemTimi TM1613  (all builds)
MotherboardTimi TM1613
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 21:48
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 49%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 107
40% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 177
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 17% Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1D72 1602) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.65
Parallax 5.91
5% 6.82 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 10.7
6% 6.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV256 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 243 250 208 237 232 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 834
Write 296
Mixed 311
SusWrite 236
92% 419 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 32.7
138% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 851
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 398
336% 507 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 147%
NT-512 512GB
117GB free
Firmware: T170810a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 308 380 390 388 367 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 360
Write 428
Mixed 357
SusWrite 366
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 24.5
89% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 119
115% 176 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 110%
ST2000LM 015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 64 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 107
Write 114
Mixed 65
SusWrite 77
121% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
113% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39%
Great: 49%
SanDisk SDSSDA240G 240GB
67GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 72 80 80 81 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
Read 125
Write 117
Mixed 108
SusWrite 78.7
143% 107 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 6.5
1,110% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 31.4
DQ Mixed 7.9
1,395% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
HGST HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
487GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.4 1.1 1.5 1.4 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 30
SusWrite 10.4
74% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 25% Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TM1613 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Timi TM1613

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback