Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '20 at 06:59
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 81.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 219 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 804 74% 620 Pts	64-Core 1,188 74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Device(7377 0000) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.4% Above average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 64.1 Parallax 55.4 49% 60 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 65.3 52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 230GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,159 Write 4,714 Mixed 5,338 1,202% 5,403 MB/s	4K Read 302 4K Write 242 4K Mixed 266 926% 270 MB/s	DQ Read 928 DQ Write 730 DQ Mixed 814 613% 824 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 903GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 114 112 112 113 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 127 Write 107 Mixed 46 SusWrite 114 72% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 86%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 710GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 107 108 107 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 98.3 Write 100 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 106 67% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 86%
MB4000GVYZK 4TB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 3.5TB free Firmware: HPG4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 144 152 149 156 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 70.5 Write 173 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 148 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.4 127% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB 6,612 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.7 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 38 111% 39 GB/s	SC Read 25.2 SC Write 39.4 SC Mixed 30.6 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	117x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	113x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	50x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	113x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	78x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	52x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $355

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16